Prediction Markets Available By State

A November 4 general coverage statement. It is retained as background, but it is not used as sufficient provider/state verification under the conservative challenge-state rule.

Published residency exclusions: all markets in Arizona and New York; sports in Nevada, Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Illinois. A nationwide operator listing is not a state-law ruling.

The current landing page advertises nationwide coverage and expressly excludes Nevada. This records that published position, not an account test.

The help article describes blocked locations and networks without publishing a complete additional state list.

September 10, 2026 article, retrieved November 12: Prediction Picks ineligible in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and New York. Washington, D.C. is expressly listed as eligible. This is not Fantasy coverage.

September 10 article surfaced again in search. It predates later withdrawals and disputes and is not accepted as fresh confirmation under the conservative challenge-state rule.

The announcement names enforcement recipients including Novig, Polymarket, Robinhood, ProphetX and Underdog Predict, and separately describes the Kalshi lawsuit. A demand to stop is recorded separately from a verified operational shutdown.

Retained earlier tracker reference. This revision uses the directly retrieved July 27 federal order for the operative injunction and operator listings for access.

Historical charges announcement; read with the later May 5 injunction. This announcement alone does not establish a current shutdown.

Historical enforcement-letter index. The October 30 federal injunction is the later operative protection considered in this revision.

Lists Kalshi and Robinhood among recipients and expressly says its list is not comprehensive.

Historical January injunction announcement. The signed March stipulation records the February 17 stay pending appeal; the original announcement is not treated as a currently effective Kalshi shutdown.

A direct announcement of the Attorney General’s amicus participation. Describes the New York Kalshi appeal and Wisconsin proceedings naming several providers. It does not establish a California restriction or the providers’ current geofences.

The court docket records the CFTC preliminary injunction being granted on May 5. The CFTC also confirms obtaining an Arizona injunction. This replaces reliance on the earlier charging announcement alone. No later lifting order was identified in this review.

May 12 announcement confirms a preliminary injunction protecting CFTC-regulated prediction markets in Arizona. The agency is a litigant; the court record supplies the order history.

Page 2 bars specified Illinois enforcement concerning swaps, including sports event contracts, on or through CFTC-regulated DCMs and FCMs. This is preliminary relief, not final nationwide legalization.

Paragraph 6 records the February 17 stay of the Kalshi injunction pending appeal. Paragraph 12 promises no specified enforcement against Polymarket US until at least 14 days after the litigation stay terminates. No subsequent termination was identified in the records reviewed.

Page 3 delays specified enforcement pending the Nevada rehearing process and requires 30 days of written notice afterward. Nevada records denial of rehearing on November 4. The notice safeguard is time-sensitive; the agreement does not establish permanent immunity.

Page 44 enjoins enforcement of section 609.7615 against CFTC-registered designated contract markets until a final merits decision. This blocks enforcement of the ban; it does not order exchanges to stop operating.

The sports prediction-market section explicitly includes Hawaii and Minnesota. Other sections describe sportsbook or free-to-play products; those are not counted as sports prediction markets.

The October 28 announcement confirms an agreement to stop new sports contracts and close remaining positions by November 25, 2026. New orders are distinct from the later position-closing deadline. This specific record supersedes Polymarket’s broader nationwide website claim.

Document 73 denies Novig’s request to block state enforcement and describes the recent Kalshi/Coinbase appellate proceedings. It is not a transaction-level verification or an order establishing that every provider has stopped accepting trades.

Page 3 affirms denial of Kalshi’s Ohio preliminary injunction, vacates the Tennessee injunction and remands. It does not itself identify every provider’s implemented new-order restrictions.

Michigan and Utah are excluded from sports options. In the specified eleven states and states with recorded legal challenges, insufficient evidence of current new sports orders is treated as unavailable. This is a display rule, not proof of a statutory ban or an independently tested shutdown.

Current category table explicitly lists Hawaii and Minnesota in its all-markets group, including sports. Michigan has no sports and Utah is financial-only. These are published product-eligibility statements, not authenticated test trades.

The current live-state list explicitly includes Hawaii and Minnesota. Michigan and Utah are absent. This supports the stated service-area listing; it is not a geolocated transaction test.

Reconfirms sports restrictions affecting Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase and Polymarket. The notice does not name every tracked provider; the all-provider Michigan display also applies the conservative listing policy.